Programmingkid <programmingk...@gmail.com> writes: > On Jan 20, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > >> On 01/20/2015 07:29 AM, Programmingkid wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 3:33 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> >>>> Programmingkid <programmingk...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> Subject was: >>>>> Re: [PATCH v7] block/raw-posix.c: Fixes raw_getlength() >>>>> on Mac OS X so that it reports the correct length of a real CD >>>> >>>> Patch history information goes... >> >>>> >>>> ... below the --- divider. >>> >>> I thought I did this. The information above is the description of the >>> patch. >>> Not its history. >> >> Anything that mentions 'v7' is history. When you read 'git log', you >> will not see mentions of 'v7', because no one cares how many tries it >> took to get a patch into git. Knowing about v7 only matters to the >> reviewers of v8, hence it is patch history that belongs after the divider. > > Ok. > >> >> >>>>> + >>>>> + if (ioctl(fd, DKIOCGETBLOCKCOUNT, §ors) == 0 >>>>> + && ioctl(fd, DKIOCGETBLOCKSIZE, §or_size) == 0) { >> >> Indentation looks off here. > > It does look a little odd, but it also communicates that this is one > statement (IMHO).
It's not how the rest of QEMU is indented. Please try to blend in :) I feel bad about notpicking v8 of an obviously useful and patch that is basically just fine except for these little things. Thanks for persevering!