Programmingkid <programmingk...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Jan 20, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> On 01/20/2015 07:29 AM, Programmingkid wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Jan 20, 2015, at 3:33 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Programmingkid <programmingk...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> 
>>>>> Subject was: 
>>>>> Re: [PATCH v7] block/raw-posix.c: Fixes raw_getlength() 
>>>>> on Mac OS X so that it reports the correct length of a real CD
>>>> 
>>>> Patch history information goes...
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ... below the --- divider.
>>> 
>>> I thought I did this. The information above is the description of the 
>>> patch. 
>>> Not its history.
>> 
>> Anything that mentions 'v7' is history.  When you read 'git log', you
>> will not see mentions of 'v7', because no one cares how many tries it
>> took to get a patch into git.  Knowing about v7 only matters to the
>> reviewers of v8, hence it is patch history that belongs after the divider.
>
> Ok. 
>
>> 
>> 
>>>>> +
>>>>> +            if (ioctl(fd, DKIOCGETBLOCKCOUNT, &sectors) == 0
>>>>> +               && ioctl(fd, DKIOCGETBLOCKSIZE, &sector_size) == 0) {
>> 
>> Indentation looks off here.
>
> It does look a little odd, but it also communicates that this is one
> statement (IMHO).

It's not how the rest of QEMU is indented.  Please try to blend in :)

I feel bad about notpicking v8 of an obviously useful and patch that is
basically just fine except for these little things.  Thanks for
persevering!

Reply via email to