On 24 January 2015 at 19:31, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 24 January 2015 at 16:36, Greg Bellows <greg.bell...@linaro.org> wrote: >> I understand what the code is doing, my point is that you rely on >> arm_is_secure_below_el3 to deal with EL2 when you could have just as easily >> checked for el<2. Not a big deal though. > > Well, I rely on the architecture to tell me that it isn't > possible for arm_is_secure_below_el3 to be true if we're > in EL2. Otherwise there'd be a bug in that function...
On reflection, I see your point, so have changed to 'el < 2 && ...' for v2. thanks -- PMM
