I examined the differences between local scans with and without a derived model file for GLib, to gauge what we're missing (the Coverity Scan service we use can't do derived model files). Doesn't look bad, but a few missed memory leaks caught my attention. I improved our model file to catch them (PATCH 1+2). Topped off with PATCH 3 to catch mixing up g_free() and free().
Markus Armbruster (3): coverity: Improve model for GLib memory allocation coverity: Model GLib string allocation partially coverity: Model g_free() isn't necessarily free() scripts/coverity-model.c | 228 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 193 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) -- 1.9.3
