On 08/02/2015 18:22, Alex Williamson wrote: > Ok, I went back to 83761b9244ad, applied 3a4dbe6aa934 to get the > object_unparent() fix, then applied this series. Everything seems to > work ok. Then I manually applied and bisected the commits that came in > via d5fbb4c9ed52. I land on 374f2981d1f1 as introducing the segfault in > memory_listener_register(). I guess I was mis-remembering where I did > my testing for the last vfio pull request. My tag was based on ec6f25e, > but I remember that I had to test based on a commit before the RCU > merge.
Ouch. memory_listeners needs mutex protection. Paolo
