On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:57:39AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 18/02/2015 05:59, David Gibson wrote: > > As PCI devices, the i82801b11 and ioh3420 devices could theoretically exist > > on any platform with a PCI bus. However in practice, they're Intel > > specific devices, > > They can be used as a generic PCIe root port and PCIe-to-PCI bridge, > they're not Intel-specific as long as your firmware doesn't care about > the vendor and device id.
Hm, ok.
> > that are very unlikely to appear on anything other than
> > an x86. Therefore this patch gives them their own config options, enabled
> > only for x86 targets by default.
>
> I think it's quite likely that we'll use them, or at least ioh3420, on
> any PCIe machine. So you probably want to add ioh3420 to arm-softmmu
> and aarch64-softmmu as well. I don't know about i82801b11, but it
> doesn't hurt to have it in ARM/AArch64 either.
>
> Also, the same can be done for xio3130, so you can also limit that one
> to x86 and ARM/Aarch64.
Ok, I'll revise accordingly.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
pgpJK0CtZl0tQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
