On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Leon Alrae wrote: > > Surely these fp_status fields are simply implementation of the architectural > > CSR registers? > > > > IMO you shouldn't store things related to TCG state, but always how the > > architecture represents it. That way you're free to change the TCG > > implementation without breaking save/restore. > > Good point. Saving fp_status and msa_fp_status doesn't seem to be needed > at all as they can be restored from FCSR and MSACSR respectively.
Agreed. Richard, thanks for the suggestion! Maciej
