"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 12:14:21AM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum <mar...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that >> > took >> > a lot of time to review and even Michael's PULL request with it is not yet >> > in master. >> >> You can view this as an argument against enormous pull requests >> with nearly a hundred patches in them -- they're much more likely >> to hit multiple issues in submission with minor things that need >> fixing, simply because of their size... >> >> thanks >> -- PMM > > Right. There were acpi changes by Igor and PCI changes by Markus,
The latter is my "[PATCH 00/10] pci: Partial conversion to realize". Quite a few pending series depend on it. > trying to merge them at once is what created this. > I guess I could instead just do two unrelated pull requests > that can be merged in parallel. Though in Marcel's case, the > problems were all in Igor's patches and these are exactly > the ones Marcel's code depends on. If we can decouple the two, problems with one won't hold up the other anymore. I can do a pull request for just my series, if that helps. But I'm prepared to leave that coveted, glamorous and rewarding job to you ;)
