On 8 March 2015 at 19:04, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote: > On 08/03/15 09:47, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 4 March 2015 at 15:20, Mark Cave-Ayland >> <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> Here are the updates from my qemu-sparc tree. Please pull. >> >>> MAINTAINERS | 3 + >>> hw/ppc/ppc.c | 161 -------------------- >>> hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 2 +- >>> hw/ppc/prep.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++-- >>> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 10 +- >>> hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 20 ++- >>> hw/timer/m48t59.c | 359 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>> include/hw/timer/m48t59.h | 61 ++++---- >>> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 | Bin 1616768 -> 1616768 bytes >>> qemu-doc.texi | 7 +- >> >> Shouldn't there be an update to roms/openbios to go with the >> pc-bios/openbios-sparc64 binary blob update? > > I haven't committed the sun4u MMIO patches to OpenBIOS yet because > without the corresponding QEMU parts OpenBIOS SVN trunk breaks (and the > QEMU parts have taken many weeks to get right which is a long time to > leave things broken). Hence I've gone for just updating the binary which > is SVN trunk plus the NVRAM MMIO accessor changes in order to preserve > bisection. > > As soon as this is applied, I can apply my remaining OpenBIOS patches > and then send a separate qemu-openbios pull request which will bring > everything up to date.
Hmm. I'm not a huge fan of having the binary in git and the submodule reference be out of step... Alex, I guess PPC is the other openbios user -- does this make sense to you? -- PMM