On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 05:34:58PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Virtqueue were indexed from zero, so don't delete virtqueue whose
index is n->max_queues * 2 + 1.
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
Bugfix? needed on master? stable?
Only for host that supports more than 8 tuntap queues. But seems a
candidate for both master and stable.
I will post this with patch 7 as an independent patches just for 2.3.
---
hw/net/virtio-net.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
index 59f76bc..b6fac9c 100644
--- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
+++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
@@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ static void
virtio_net_set_multiqueue(VirtIONet *n, int multiqueue)
n->multiqueue = multiqueue;
- for (i = 2; i <= n->max_queues * 2 + 1; i++) {
+ for (i = 2; i < n->max_queues * 2 + 1; i++) {
virtio_del_queue(vdev, i);
}
--
2.1.0
