> On 24 March 2015 at 15:08, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 24/03/2015 15:53, Peter Maydell wrote: > >>> > In any case, the removal or segregation of ld/st*_phys should be a > >>> > separate series for ease of review. > >> Who wants to remove ld/st*_phys? Not me... > > > > Well, you want to rename them _and_ add new arguments. Basically at the > > end they don't exist anymore as we know them now. :) > > I guess :-) So what exactly would you like to see as a > separate series?
Adding the arguments / renaming the functions, for those callers of ld/st*_phys that use cs->as as the first argument. Paolo
