On 01/04/2015 11:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> > Peter, if you prefer you can just revert c3c1bb99.
> Given the SPARC reset breakage also, I agree with you
> (in the other thread) that we should revert c3c1bb99
> for 2.3, and fix this all properly in 2.4.

Yup, pull request coming.

Paolo

Reply via email to