On 01/04/2015 11:10, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > Peter, if you prefer you can just revert c3c1bb99. > Given the SPARC reset breakage also, I agree with you > (in the other thread) that we should revert c3c1bb99 > for 2.3, and fix this all properly in 2.4.
Yup, pull request coming. Paolo