On 13/04/2015 13:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> So you are suggesting each device add it's own SSDT? I'm not sure how >>>> that helps debugging, it seems simpler to add it to a common one. >>> >>> For example, it's easier to write a unit test: encode something specific >>> in one of the IDs, then look it up. >>> Which is, btw, something that's missing in this patchset. >> >> A unit test for what? > > The ACPI code added. With an extra table it would be easy > to test that it's there.
Ah, I agree that patch 15 should add something like commit 3a9c86df/71096d6c, but that doesn't need a separate table. Paolo
