On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:47:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 30/04/2015 22:21, Andreas Färber wrote: > >>+ cpu->self = cobj; > >>+ object_property_add_link(cpu_container, path, TYPE_CPU, &cpu->self, > >>NULL, > >>+ OBJ_PROP_LINK_UNREF_ON_RELEASE, &error_abort); > > Doesn't this leak the CPU object?
I am not sure I follow. CPUs can't be destroyed today because there's no code to remove them from the global cpus list. The day we implement cpu_exec_uninit(), it should undo everything done by cpu_exec_init() including removing the link above and removing the CPU from the global cpus list. > > I have a patch to add "." and ".." properties. You can use them to add > an alias to an object. What's the difference between a link and an alias to an object? -- Eduardo
