On 04/09/2010 03:06 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> I think this alteration of existing args is faaaar too complex & fragile, >> and way overkill. > > Would it not be simpler, for the target audience, for the config to > contain a one-line shell script to transform particular matched > arguments in any way that's wanted?
Yeah, having the ability to specify an optional wrapper script, that receives the name of the normal interpreter and all the arguments the normal interpreter would have been given, sounds like the ultimate in flexibility at a minimum of xml. It comes at the expense of pushing the burden of flexibility onto the shoulders of whoever writes the wrapper script, but that seems okay to me. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
