Am 08.05.2015 um 12:16 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > On 08/05/2015 12:08, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > If so, the commands seem to be hopelessly underspecified, especially > > with respect to error conditions. And where it says something about > > errors, it doesn't make sense: The server is forbidden to reply to a > > NBD_CMD_FLUSH if it failed... (qemu-nbd ignores this, obviously) > > So does nbd-server. O:-) Looks like you're reading the spec too > literally (which is never a bad thing).
I don't think there is something like reading a spec too literally. Specs are meant to be read literally. If a specification is open to interpretation, you don't need it. So I'd rather say I've found a bug in the spec. ;-) As you already seem to be working on the NBD mailing list, do you want to fix this, or should I subscribe and send a patch myself? Kevin
