On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 05:59:44PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > The following situation was observed in the field: > tap1 sends packets, tap2 does not consume them, as a result > tap1 can not be closed. This happens because > tun/tap devices can hang on to skbs undefinitely. > > As noted by Herbert, possible solutions include a timeout followed by a > copy/change of ownership of the skb, or always copying/changing > ownership if we're going into a hostile device. > > This patch implements the second approach. > > Note: one issue still remaining is that since skbs > keep reference to tun socket and tun socket has a > reference to tun device, we won't flush backlog, > instead simply waiting for all skbs to get transmitted. > At least this is not user-triggerable, and > this was not reported in practice, my assumption is > other devices besides tap complete an skb > within finite time after it has been queued. > > A possible solution for the second issue > would not to have socket reference the device, > instead, implement dev->destructor for tun, and > wait for all skbs to complete there, but this > needs some thought, probably too risky for 2.6.34. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > Tested-by: Yan Vugenfirer <yvuge...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
