On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Wen Congyang <we...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > On 05/21/2015 12:31 AM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert >> <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> * Wen Congyang (ghost...@gmail.com) wrote: >>>> At 2015/5/14 19:19, Dr. David Alan Gilbert Wrote: >>>>> One thing I wanted to check I understand; how much RAM do the active and >>>>> hidden >>>>> disks use; lets say during the 1st checkpoint 10MB of disk is written, >>>>> and during hte 2nd checkpoint a different 10MB of the disk is written >>>>> (to different locations on the disk); how big are the active and hidden >>>>> disks in RAM - are they 10MB or 20MB? >>>> >>>> 10MB, we will make active and hidden disks empty when doing checkpoint. >>> >>> Thanks, that's what I was hoping. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Wen Congyang >>> -- >>> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK >>> >> >> >> Hello Wen, others, >> >> are you planning to add raw support for a disk underlying below >> nbd-server (secondary copy in docs) anytime soon? > > What do you want? The primary disk and secondary disk can be any > format. > > Thanks > Wen Congyang
Oh, sorry, I misread the statement in the readme yesterday, thought that the second storage must be in qcow2 format. Over yesterday`s late hours I had picked 'bottom' patches for 3.10 (seqadj introduction and nfnetlink improvements) and will play with COLO very soon.