On 26 May 2015 at 09:36, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 26/05/2015 10:31, Andreas Färber wrote: >>>> It's not about which tree it goes through, it's about you not >>>> asking first - which I reminded you of just days ago, so this appears >>>> deliberate. >>> >>> It certainly is. >> >> Then you can fix up Daniel's patch yourself and I am stepping down as >> maintainer. Have fun. > > This seems a bit of an overreaction.
I think your rather abrupt statement above was rather unfortunately open to misinterpretation... > If you mean deliberate as in "stepping on someone else's toes", that was > not it. > > If you mean deliberate as in "disagreeing on whether identifiers > contribute to maintainance areas for such a trivial patch", and applying > this patch because I truly believe(d) you wouldn't care, then it was. ...since it didn't have this clarification. -- PMM
