From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.z...@linaro.org>

valgrind complains about:
==25058== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 623 of 3,473
==25058==    at 0x4C2845D: malloc (in 
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==25058==    by 0x2EB657: malloc_and_trace (vl.c:2556)
==25058==    by 0x64C770E: g_malloc (in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.3600.3)
==25058==    by 0x377C27: qemu_extend_irqs (irq.c:55)
==25058==    by 0x377CB3: qemu_allocate_irqs (irq.c:64)
==25058==    by 0x222338: ich9_lpc_pm_init (lpc_ich9.c:365)
==25058==    by 0x255C42: pc_q35_init (pc_q35.c:255)
==25058==    by 0x2EFA22: main (vl.c:4249)

Since ich9_lpc_pm_init only requests one irq, so let it just call
qemu_allocate_irq.

Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshengl...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.z...@linaro.org>
---
 hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
index dba7585..144b210 100644
--- a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
+++ b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
@@ -360,11 +360,8 @@ static void ich9_set_sci(void *opaque, int irq_num, int 
level)
 void ich9_lpc_pm_init(PCIDevice *lpc_pci)
 {
     ICH9LPCState *lpc = ICH9_LPC_DEVICE(lpc_pci);
-    qemu_irq *sci_irq;
-
-    sci_irq = qemu_allocate_irqs(ich9_set_sci, lpc, 1);
-    ich9_pm_init(lpc_pci, &lpc->pm, sci_irq[0]);
 
+    ich9_pm_init(lpc_pci, &lpc->pm, qemu_allocate_irq(ich9_set_sci, lpc, 0));
     ich9_lpc_reset(&lpc->d.qdev);
 }
 
-- 
2.0.4



Reply via email to