From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.z...@linaro.org> valgrind complains about: ==25058== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 623 of 3,473 ==25058== at 0x4C2845D: malloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==25058== by 0x2EB657: malloc_and_trace (vl.c:2556) ==25058== by 0x64C770E: g_malloc (in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.3600.3) ==25058== by 0x377C27: qemu_extend_irqs (irq.c:55) ==25058== by 0x377CB3: qemu_allocate_irqs (irq.c:64) ==25058== by 0x222338: ich9_lpc_pm_init (lpc_ich9.c:365) ==25058== by 0x255C42: pc_q35_init (pc_q35.c:255) ==25058== by 0x2EFA22: main (vl.c:4249)
Since ich9_lpc_pm_init only requests one irq, so let it just call qemu_allocate_irq. Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshengl...@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.z...@linaro.org> --- hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c index dba7585..144b210 100644 --- a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c +++ b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c @@ -360,11 +360,8 @@ static void ich9_set_sci(void *opaque, int irq_num, int level) void ich9_lpc_pm_init(PCIDevice *lpc_pci) { ICH9LPCState *lpc = ICH9_LPC_DEVICE(lpc_pci); - qemu_irq *sci_irq; - - sci_irq = qemu_allocate_irqs(ich9_set_sci, lpc, 1); - ich9_pm_init(lpc_pci, &lpc->pm, sci_irq[0]); + ich9_pm_init(lpc_pci, &lpc->pm, qemu_allocate_irq(ich9_set_sci, lpc, 0)); ich9_lpc_reset(&lpc->d.qdev); } -- 2.0.4