On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:59:38PM -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: >> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Bharata B Rao >> <bhar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> > All the comments have been addressed and the series has been reviewed >> > by David, Eduardo and Igor. Can this series be taken in now ? >> > >> >> Andreas' comment on P3 looks unaddressed. I think it can be handled by >> just putting that one sentance explanation you gave in commit message, >> or if its far enough out of scope just drop the change. >> >> I think Igor's comment was an out of scope suggestion in the end so >> nothing needed there? >> >> Regards, >> Peter >> >> P.S. I am not the maintainer but I need to rebase on you for one of my >> patch sets so I'd like to help see this though! > > Should I be rebasing against latest master or anyone else's tree to make > it easier for inclusion ? >
I don't know about anyone elses tree, but there is an edit to last patch so a fresh complete v4 rebased is probably going to make life easy for whoever. I have CCd Paolo who owns exec.c according to MAINTAINERS. Regards, Peter > Regards, > Bharata. > >
