On 7 June 2015 at 09:49, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > OK I am at the bottom of it. The case statement only handles the base > arch and the host arch not the actual target arch.
Aha. > This means the > "arm)" case is all that is called for aarch64 target. the "aarch64)" > case in existing code is presumably to handle an AArch64 host. So the > current code will produce the minimal working configury. My patch will > still work, but will unneedingly add AArch32 disas to AA64 host. Presumably also the current code will unnecessarily add an A64 disassembler for all AArch32 host builds. > A solution would be to patch that loop to go through all of the base > arch, target arch and host arch. Anyone know of a reason not to do so? Not offhand, but then I didn't figure out how the current code worked when I looked at it :-) We'd get duplicate lines in the config files, but we already have those when host==target. -- PMM
