On Mo, 2015-06-08 at 14:10 -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: > The fw_cfg cleanup series exposed a memory leak occurring on ppc and sparc > machine types. > > This series adds a safe fw_cfg integer-type update function (1/2), and > modifies ppc and sparc callbacks to use it instead of the current leaky > method (2/2). > > This should preferably go in *before* "fw_cfg: remove support for guest-side > data writes", which would otherwise cause certain ppc and sparc command > lines to crash. > > Once these are reviewed (also, see additional questions in 1/1), should I > re-spin the whole set, or keep these two as a separate, independent series?
Keeping separate is fine, I'll order the patches via 'git rebase'. cheers, Gerd
