On 12 June 2015 at 20:10, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > Currently, the return code for get_phys_addr is overloaded for both > success/fail and FSR value return. This doesn't handle the case where > there is an error with a 0 FSR. This case exists in PMSAv7. > > So rework get_phys_addr and friends to return a success/failure boolean > return code and populate the FSR via a caller provided uint32_t > pointer.
true-on-failure, false-on-success is an odd way round for a success/failure bool, but I guess it keeps the rest of the code from changing too much... -- PMM
