On 12 June 2015 at 18:56, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Eric Auger <eric.au...@linaro.org> wrote: >> commit ac9d32e39664e060cd1b538ff190980d57ad69e4 had the consequence to >> register the do_cpu_reset after the rom_reset one. Hence they get >> executed in the wrong order. This commit restores the registration of >> do_cpu_reset in arm_load_kernel. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@linaro.org> > > Reported-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> > Tested-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> > Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> > > I don't think this is the ideal solution but it does fix my bug and it > is straight revert of the critical part of 9d32.., so it is OK as the > near term fix. I'll make some comments on the other thread.
Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. -- PMM
