> On 19 Jun 2015, at 09:42, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19/06/2015 09:40, Mark Burton wrote:
>>> On 19/06/2015 09:29, Mark Burton wrote:
>>>> Does anybody know if the current atomic_cmpxchg will support
>>>> 64 bit on a (normal) 32 bit x86, or do we need to special
>>>> case that with cmpxchg8b ? (I get the impression that it will
>>>> automatically use cmpxchg8b, but not cmpxchg16b - but I’m by
>>>> no means sure).
>>>
>>> Both cmpxchg8b and cmpxchg16b are used, respectively on 32-bit
>>> and 64-bit x86.
>>
>> Thanks Paolo, so we are OK for x86, but we would need to disable
>> multi-thread for other 32 bit hosts, and provide a correct
>> implementation for non multi-thread…
>
> But Alvise's implementation for example would work there. It is just
> this optimization (that is also not architecturally correct on ARM) that
> is problematic.
Yes, that is exactly correct.
Cheers
Mark.
>
> Paolo
>
>> You dont happen to know of a
>> convenient macro we can use to test for ’32 bit hosts that dont
>> support 64bit cmpxchg ….’
>
+44 (0)20 7100 3485 x 210
+33 (0)5 33 52 01 77x 210
+33 (0)603762104
mark.burton
