"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote: > * Michael R. Hines (mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
>> > qemu_rdma_registration_handle_unregister_success(uint64_t chunk) "%" >> > PRIu64 >> >-qemu_rdma_registration_handle_wait(uint64_t flags) "Waiting for next >> >request %" PRIu64 >> >+qemu_rdma_registration_handle_wait(void) "" >> >> Are you using some kind of script to generate these trace prototypes? >> What happened to the message? =) > > The prototypes I added manually. You normally have the trace name in your > tool so you don't need the text that gives you the same piece of information. > So I get output like: > > 25988@1434041422.299944:qemu_rdma_registration_handle_ram_blocks > > without having to write anything in the text. > (That's with the stderr trace backend, and the prefix being PID and time) Notice also that he removed the flags argument on the caller function, so nothing to print there, really. > > Dave > >> >> > qemu_rdma_registration_start(uint64_t flags) "%" PRIu64 >> > qemu_rdma_registration_stop(uint64_t flags) "%" PRIu64 >> > qemu_rdma_registration_stop_ram(void) "" >> > -- > Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
