On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:41:43PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:30:42 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 04:58:37PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:09:10 +0100
> > > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On 8 July 2015 at 10:46, Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > extends memory_region_add_subregion() by adding Error**
> > > > > argument to allow t fail and return a error from it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> > > > >  156 files changed, 619 insertions(+), 420 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > This is a seriously invasive API change and I don't
> > > > really like it -- reconfiguring the memory region
> > > > hierarchy should not be an operation which can fail
> > > > (especially not just adding a subregion!)
> > > > 
> > > > -- PMM
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I'll drop this patch in favor of dedicated
> > > memory_region_add_subregion_to_hva() API that can fail and return
> > > error.
> > 
> > Personally, I think it would be better to have an API that gets
> > a hva and a callback to invoke before releasing MR.
> > 
> > It's just a question of taste though.
> > 
> 
> that won't handle check at subregion_add time if region is available
> and error out if it's.

The point is that you request a hva range *before* adding regions.
Then pass it in.

-- 
MST

Reply via email to