* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On 07/07/2015 15:08, Juan Quintela wrote: > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> > > > > Perform some basic (but probably not complete) sanity checking on > > requests from the RDMA source. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Michael R. Hines <mrhi...@us.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> > > --- > > migration/rdma.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c > > index 73844a3..73a79be 100644 > > --- a/migration/rdma.c > > +++ b/migration/rdma.c > > @@ -2992,6 +2992,13 @@ static int qemu_rdma_registration_handle(QEMUFile > > *f, void *opaque) > > trace_qemu_rdma_registration_handle_compress(comp->length, > > comp->block_idx, > > comp->offset); > > + if (comp->block_idx >= rdma->local_ram_blocks.nb_blocks) { > > + error_report("rdma: 'compress' bad block index %u (vs %d)", > > + (unsigned int)comp->block_idx, > > + rdma->local_ram_blocks.nb_blocks); > > + ret = -EIO; > > + break; > > Did you want "goto out" here, and especially inside the for loop below:
Yes, it was nice of Coverity to spot that. > > + } > > block = &(rdma->local_ram_blocks.block[comp->block_idx]); > > > > host_addr = block->local_host_addr + > > @@ -3080,8 +3087,23 @@ static int qemu_rdma_registration_handle(QEMUFile > > *f, void *opaque) > > trace_qemu_rdma_registration_handle_register_loop(count, > > reg->current_index, reg->key.current_addr, > > reg->chunks); > > > > + if (reg->current_index >= > > rdma->local_ram_blocks.nb_blocks) { > > + error_report("rdma: 'register' bad block index %u (vs > > %d)", > > + (unsigned int)reg->current_index, > > + rdma->local_ram_blocks.nb_blocks); > > + ret = -ENOENT; > > + break; > > Here > > > + } > > block = > > &(rdma->local_ram_blocks.block[reg->current_index]); > > if (block->is_ram_block) { > > + if (block->offset > reg->key.current_addr) { > > + error_report("rdma: bad register address for block > > %s" > > + " offset: %" PRIx64 " current_addr: %" PRIx64, > > + block->block_name, block->offset, > > + reg->key.current_addr); > > + ret = -ERANGE; > > + break; > > here > > > + } > > host_addr = (block->local_host_addr + > > (reg->key.current_addr - block->offset)); > > chunk = ram_chunk_index(block->local_host_addr, > > @@ -3090,6 +3112,14 @@ static int qemu_rdma_registration_handle(QEMUFile > > *f, void *opaque) > > chunk = reg->key.chunk; > > host_addr = block->local_host_addr + > > (reg->key.chunk * (1UL << RDMA_REG_CHUNK_SHIFT)); > > + /* Check for particularly bad chunk value */ > > + if (host_addr < (void *)block->local_host_addr) { > > + error_report("rdma: bad chunk for block %s" > > + " chunk: %" PRIx64, > > + block->block_name, reg->key.chunk); > > + ret = -ERANGE; > > + break; > > and here the "break" takes you directly to > > ret = qemu_rdma_post_send_control(rdma, > (uint8_t *) results, ®_resp); > > where ret is overwritten (spotted by Coverity). Yes, it needs the goto's back. Dave > > Paolo > > > Paolo > > > + } > > } > > chunk_start = ram_chunk_start(block, chunk); > > chunk_end = ram_chunk_end(block, chunk + reg->chunks); > > > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK