On 7/19/15 19:31, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 6/13/15 21:10, Chen Gang wrote:
>> +
>> +void cpu_loop(CPUTLGState *env)
>> +{
>> + CPUState *cs = CPU(tilegx_env_get_cpu(env));
>> + int trapnr;
>> +
>> + while (1) {
>> + cpu_exec_start(cs);
>> + trapnr = cpu_tilegx_exec(env);
>> + cpu_exec_end(cs);
>> + switch (trapnr) {
>> + case TILEGX_EXCP_SYSCALL:
>> + env->regs[TILEGX_R_RE] = do_syscall(env, env->regs[TILEGX_R_NR],
>> + env->regs[0], env->regs[1],
>> + env->regs[2], env->regs[3],
>> + env->regs[4], env->regs[5],
>> + env->regs[6], env->regs[7]);
>> + env->regs[TILEGX_R_ERR] =
>> TILEGX_IS_ERRNO(env->regs[TILEGX_R_RE])
>> + ?
>> env->regs[TILEGX_R_RE]
>
> It needs "- env->regs[TILEGX_R_RE]" instead of "env->regs[TILEGX_R_RE]".
>
> For stat64, when return ENOENT, qemu will mark it as -ENOENT, so syscall
> should revert it again.
>
After this fix, the tilegx linux-user can let busybox pass simple test
(manually using sh, ls, cp, mv, and vi are OK).
Next, I shall start gcc testsuite with tilegx linux-user. :-)
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
