On 27/07/2015 13:11, Gonglei wrote:
> On 2015/7/27 18:20, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 27/07/2015 08:25, arei.gong...@huawei.com wrote:
>>> +++ b/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
>>> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int vhost_scsi_start(VHostSCSI *s)
>>> * enabling/disabling irqfd.
>>> */
>>> for (i = 0; i < s->dev.nvqs; i++) {
>>> - vhost_virtqueue_mask(&s->dev, vdev, i, false);
>>> + vhost_virtqueue_mask(&s->dev, vdev, s->dev.vq_index + i, false);
>>> }
>>>
>>> return ret;
>>
>> Is this fixing an actual bug, or just using the API correctly?
>> s->dev.vq_index is always 0, right?
>>
> Yes. At present, we found that s->dev.vq_index is always 0.
Ok, then I've applied the patch with this commit message:
vhost_virtqueue_mask takes an "absolute" virtqueue index, while the
code looks like it's passing an index that is relative to
s->dev.vq_index. In reality, s->dev.vq_index is always zero, so
this patch does not make any difference, but the code is clearer.
Paolo
