-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2015-07-27 12:13, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:49:29AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:13:42AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2015-07-20 17:01, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov >>>> <v.tols...@selfip.ru> wrote: >>>>> 2015-07-20 14:55 GMT+03:00 zhanghailiang >>>>> <zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com>: >>>>>> Agreed, besides, it is seemed that slirp is not >>>>>> supporting ipv6, we also have to supplement it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> patch for ipv6 slirp support some times ago sended to qemu >>>>> list, but i don't know why in not accepted. >>>> >>>> I think no one reviewed it but there was no objection against >>>> IPv6 support in principle. >>>> >>>> Jan: Can we merge slirp IPv6 support for QEMU 2.5? >>> >>> Sorry, as I pointed out some time back, I don't have the >>> bandwidth to look into slirp. Someone need to do a review, then >>> send a pull request. >> >> Do you want to remove yourself from the slirp section of the >> MAINTAINERS file? >> >> Going forward we'll need to find someone familiar with the QEMU >> development process and with enough time to review slirp >> patches. > > Ping? > > I hoped this would raise some discussion and that maybe we could > find a new maintainer or co-maintainer to get slirp moving. > > Any thoughts?
Of course, I'm fine with handing this over to someone who'd like to pick up. Do we have volunteers? Samuel, would you like to do this? As a subsystem maintainer, you are already familiar with QEMU processes. Well, this still wouldn't resolve the independent review need for slirp-ipv6. Jan - -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlW2MycACgkQitSsb3rl5xSCaACePNubKPBkrdxQkcThUGD7w56B Q6oAoIgCzT9qVRzDf5IhY2eKFXgTZ+Ul =yk6R -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----