On 27/07/2015 15:40, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > temps[dst].next_copy = temps[src].next_copy; > > temps[dst].prev_copy = src; > > temps[temps[dst].next_copy].prev_copy = dst; > > temps[src].next_copy = dst; > > Note that the patch doesn't change this part, it's already there in the > original code.
Understood. > > This is: > > > > dst->next = src->next; > > dst->prev = src; > > dst->next->prev = dst; > > src->next = dst; > > Here we just want to insert one element, and thus before > the insertion we have dst->next = dst->prev = dst. Ah, you're right. Paolo
