"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > Code for saving irq_state got vm_state > macros wrong, passing in the wrong parameter. > As a result, we both saved a wrong value > and restored it to a wrong offset. > > This leads to device and bus irq counts getting > out of sync, which in turn leads to interrupts getting lost or > never cleared, such as > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588133 > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> Code is "obviously" wrong (TM). I didn't catch it when it was introduced. How can it ever have worked since that commit? > --- > > Juan, could you please take a look at this patch? > I managed to catch this bug by looking at > a savevm image which already has a wrong value, > but I could not reproduce it locally so I don't know > for sure whether patch is enough, or there are other bugs. > > Anthony, this is a regression introduced in > eea4acfa5c1ef26439a718375475fe468b7f2fba > so we need the fix on 0.12 branch as well. > > hw/pci.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c > index 95bfa3d..5452b86 100644 > --- a/hw/pci.c > +++ b/hw/pci.c > @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static VMStateInfo vmstate_info_pci_config = { > > static int get_pci_irq_state(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, size_t size) > { > - PCIDevice *s = container_of(pv, PCIDevice, config); > + PCIDevice *s = container_of(pv, PCIDevice, irq_state); > uint32_t irq_state[PCI_NUM_PINS]; > int i; > for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_PINS; ++i) { > @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int get_pci_irq_state(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, > size_t size) > static void put_pci_irq_state(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, size_t size) > { > int i; > - PCIDevice *s = container_of(pv, PCIDevice, config); > + PCIDevice *s = container_of(pv, PCIDevice, irq_state); > > for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_PINS; ++i) { > qemu_put_be32(f, pci_irq_state(s, i));