On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:15:28AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:19:40 +0530
> Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > pc_dimm_realize() validates the NUMA node to which memory hotplug is
> > being performed only in case of NUMA configuration. Include a check
> > to fail invalid nodes in case of non-NUMA configuration too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
>
> > ---
> > hw/mem/pc-dimm.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c b/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c
> > index bb04862..099025e 100644
> > --- a/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c
> > +++ b/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c
> > @@ -414,10 +414,11 @@ static void pc_dimm_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> > **errp)
> > error_setg(errp, "'" PC_DIMM_MEMDEV_PROP "' property is not set");
> > return;
> > }
> > - if ((nb_numa_nodes > 0) && (dimm->node >= nb_numa_nodes)) {
> > + if (((nb_numa_nodes > 0) && (dimm->node >= nb_numa_nodes)) ||
> > + (!nb_numa_nodes && dimm->node)) {
> > error_setg(errp, "'DIMM property " PC_DIMM_NODE_PROP " has value %"
> > PRIu32 "' which exceeds the number of numa nodes: %d",
> > - dimm->node, nb_numa_nodes);
> > + dimm->node, nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes : 1);
> > return;
> > }
> > }
Eduardo - Will this go via your tree ?
Regards,
Bharata.
