On 2015-08-03 14:41, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 02:31 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >On 2015-08-03 12:35, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> if (msb != 31) {
> >>- tcg_gen_andi_tl(t0, t0, (1 << (msb + 1)) - 1);
> >>+ tcg_gen_andi_tl(t0, t0, (1U << (msb + 1)) - 1);
> >
> >Is this change really needed?
>
> msb == 30 means 1 << 31. Which officially must be unsigned to be correct.
> If we were to run under ubsan, this would trigger an error.
Ok.
> >Note that DEXT can't fail as both lsb and msb are in the range 0..31.
> >DEXTU and DEXTM can.
> ...
> >The same way DINSM can't fail.
>
> Yes, I know. But it seems cleaner to do the checks always, unifying all of
> the code.
Agreed.
> >Should we try to get this one into 2.4, if not already too late?
>
> Perhaps. Otherwise via stable after the fact.
Ok. Leon, do you have other pending patches for 2.4/2.4.1? The
semihosting microMIPS R6 one maybe?
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
