On 04/08/2015 09:39, Alex Bennée wrote: > At the point of a tb_flush all bets are off as we will re-generate all > the blocks at potentially different locations in the translation buffer. > However for most analysis cases you are unlikely to cause the code > buffer to overflow. Most other uses of tb_flush are the result > debugging. > > I could add a printf when --perfmap is enabled to flag when a flush > happens to signal to the user? I guess some more caveats in the flag > description wouldn't hurt. > > We could consider truncating and re-starting the JIT dump at each flush?
Yes, it makes sense to me. printf + truncation would work. Paolo
