On 24 August 2015 at 17:17, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > An obvious typo in the mnemonic here. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> > --- > target-tilegx/opcode_tilegx.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target-tilegx/opcode_tilegx.h b/target-tilegx/opcode_tilegx.h > index 3b8bf4f..989436d 100644 > --- a/target-tilegx/opcode_tilegx.h > +++ b/target-tilegx/opcode_tilegx.h > @@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ enum > LD_UNARY_OPCODE_X1 = 29, > LNK_UNARY_OPCODE_X1 = 30, > LNK_UNARY_OPCODE_Y1 = 14, > - LWNA_ADD_IMM8_OPCODE_X1 = 21, > + LDNA_ADD_IMM8_OPCODE_X1 = 21, > MFSPR_IMM8_OPCODE_X1 = 22, > MF_UNARY_OPCODE_X1 = 31, > MM_BF_OPCODE_X0 = 7, > -- > 2.4.3
Should we feed this fix and the one in patch 6 back to the kernel? thanks -- PMM
