On 28 August 2015 at 17:19, Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Longer term though, maybe these homogeneous every-arch change patterns > should only need a critical mass of acks from the arch maintainers for > the whole thing to go through. It's unlikely that I botched moxie with > most of the other arches reviewed, so chasing that ack from the last > maintainer might not be needed. That or a generic reviewer should be > able to ack ones like this, and it's almost candidate for trivial.
I think that's reasonable. I don't have a great deal of sympathy if the minor architectures break if they don't have maintainers who are willing to actually stick around on qemu-devel and review changes to their code, rather than just dumping a patchset on us and vanishing. -- PMM
