On 04/09/2015 08:56, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> > >> > Personally I'd prefer to see us focus on just solving the simple >> > cases first, so we don't end up stuck arguing over the hard >> > cases and holding up potential quick wins ! > That's a sensible approach when the solutions to the simple cases are > likely to stand regardless of whether and how we later crack the hard > cases. I guess it's sensible here. Let me explain. > > I prefer defining properties in static data rather than code, because > reasoning over static data is so much easier. If we can find a way to > do that even for the hard cases, lovely. If we can't, then I'd still > prefer the softer cases done in data. Two mechanisms instead of one > (bad), but the vast majority of cases becomes simpler (good).
I agree. Plus, we already have two mechanisms anyway "thanks" to qdev static properties, so it's a net improvement. paolo
