Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 17.05.2010 11:00, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 05/16/2010 11:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > [] >>>> We've regressed from failing some migrations to failing all migrations. >>> Humm, 0.12.4 -> 0.12.4 should work. My advise is just revert the patch >>> and live with it for another week, what do you think? >> >> A week is fine. I'm not going to release 0.12.4.1 for the week until you >> fix it, and just changing things in git doesn't help users. > > There are at least 1 other problem in the migration code that's > worth looking at (IMHO anyway): namely, migration on 32 bit host > is completely (as far as i can see) broken (instant kvm process > crash) in 0.12, but it works on 64bits: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/k...@vger.kernel.org/msg34051.html > > I wonder why it is not noticed before -- it's broken since 0.12...
People has become rich and everybody has a 64 bit hardware :-) Will take a look at the end of the week. Thank for the report, Juan.
