On Mon, 17 May 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 05/17/2010 04:35 PM, malc wrote: > > There's one thing that SDL does marvelously well - it's just one fairly > > small and self contained library that doesn't unleash dependency hell on > > the user. > > > > > The fact that we have cocoa support in the tree is basically an admission > > > of > > > failure with SDL. > > > > > I don't think so, the way i see it: someone had an itch (i.e. an > > application that does not integrate well with his windowing environment) > > and he scratched it. > > > > SDL doesn't integrate well into a modern Gnome desktop either. I don't see > why we have Cocoa and not Gtk. If the answer is, someone needs to send > patches, expect patches soon :-) >
If those patches don't try to force Gnome on me (by removing SDL that is and being optional) let them come. -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru