15.09.2015 19:22, Markus Armbruster wrote: > "Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> writes: [] >> Personally I be fine with both the minimal approach or the more >> comprehensive approach of Peter's, but I'd probably tend towards >> the minimal approach to avoid the warnings problem. > > Seconded. > > The "minimal approach" has been on the list since June, and it has my > R-by. It's clearly better than nothing. Let's commit it now. We can > always improve on it later.
Ok, let's apply it. BTW, Marcus, your R-By wasn't actually clear, to which version it applies. Now I see that after your comment. Applied, finally, to -trivial now, thank you all! Should I add some more r-by or s-by? :) Thanks! /mjt
