On 22 September 2015 at 06:58, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 11/09/2015 16:45, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: >> > Hi. This looks like it's a branch, not a gpg signed tag? >> > I only take signed pullreqs these days... >> >> OK > > I'll take these patches then until you sort out the GPG signing (I see > you have created a GPG key 96CF610A).
Note that my current requirement is that the pull be a signed tag, but not (yet) that the key used to sign it have a trust path from me to it... (As it happens I expect to be able to sign Peter C's key today.) -- PMM
