On 09/23/15 13:47, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:37:08 +0200 > Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 09/23/15 10:04, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:16:24 -0300 >>> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> In 2012, QEMU had a bug where it exposed QEMU version information >>>> to the guest, meaning a QEMU upgrade would expose different >>>> hardware to the guest OS even if the same machine-type is being >>>> used. >>>> >>>> The bug was fixed by commit 93bfef4c6e4b23caea9d51e1099d06433d8835a4, >>>> on all machines up to pc-1.0. But we kept introducing the same >>>> bug on all newer machines since then. That means we are breaking >>>> guest ABI every time QEMU was upgraded. >>>> >>>> Fix this by setting the hw_version on all PC machines, making >>>> sure the hardware won't change when upgrading QEMU. >>>> >>>> This series is based on Michael's PCI tree, plus the "Set >>>> broken_reserved_end on pc-*-2.4, not 2.5" patch I submitted >>>> earlier today. >>> I haven't seen this patch on list, perhaps it needs to be resubmitted? >> >> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-09/msg05778.html > If I'm not mistaken it's link to this series and not to > "Set broken_reserved_end on pc-*-2.4, not 2.5" patch.
Ugh, right. Sorry. I misunderstood what you meant with "this". Laszlo
