On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Peter Crosthwaite > <crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> XTFPGA FLASH is tied to XTFPGA system IO block. It's not very important >>> for systems with MMU where system IO block is visible at single >>> location, >> >> Are your relying on a matching change in the guest for MMU setup here? >> >> Can you explain a little more how the MMU allows a physical address >> remap of the underlying hardware as this looks like a non >> backwards-compatible board design rev. > > No change is needed as this change doesn't affect memory map. > It only detaches FLASH from the system memory and attaches it > to the system IO region, at the same physical address as before. >
Ok I get it now :). Commit message confused me a little with the MMU stuff but reading it again it makes sense. Change looks good. I'll wait for resolution on P1 before putting an RB. Regards, Peter > -- > Thanks. > -- Max
