On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:19:06PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: > On 5/19/10, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > The system emulators for each arch are using inconsistent > > naming for the default PCI bus "pci" vs "pci.0". Since it > > is conceivable we'll have multiple PCI buses in the future > > standardize on "pci.0" for all architectures. This ensures > > mgmt apps can rely on a name when assigning PCI devices an > > address on the bus using eg '-device e1000,bus=pci.0,addr=3' > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> > > --- > > hw/grackle_pci.c | 2 +- > > hw/gt64xxx.c | 2 +- > > hw/ppc4xx_pci.c | 2 +- > > hw/ppce500_pci.c | 2 +- > > hw/prep_pci.c | 2 +- > > hw/sh_pci.c | 2 +- > > hw/unin_pci.c | 4 ++-- > > hw/versatile_pci.c | 2 +- > > Missing hw/apb_pci.c.
Ah yes, don't know how I missed that. Have posted another version of this patch with that included Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|