On 08/10/2015 11:41, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 10:54 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Simplify memory allocation by sticking with a single API.  GSlice
>>> is not that fast anyway (tcmalloc/jemalloc are better).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  block/io.c            | 4 ++--
>>>  block/mirror.c        | 4 ++--
>>>  block/raw-posix.c     | 8 ++++----
>>>  block/raw-win32.c     | 4 ++--
>>>  hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 4 ++--
>>>  5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> Thanks, applied to my block tree:
>> https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block
> 
> Has someone benchmarked this before applying? Just claiming "wasn't fast
> anyway" doesn't generally seem sufficient for changes to the I/O path.

I did it about six months ago.  Sorry for not digging up the results
when posting:

baseline: 193 kiops
tcmalloc: 202 kiops
tcmalloc + G_SLICE=always-malloc: 210 kiops

Paolo

Reply via email to