On 10/10/15 06:10, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 10/09/2015 09:48 AM, Chen Gang wrote: >> On 10/7/15 18:17, Chen Gang wrote: >>> On 10/7/15 17:19, Richard Henderson wrote: >>>> On 10/04/2015 10:15 PM, Chen Gang wrote: >>>>>> From 40ec3f1c75b4c97e3e0495c9e465be898f48a652 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>> From: Chen Gang<gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 17:34:17 +0800 >>>>> Subject: [PATCH] target-tilegx: Let prefetch nop instructions return >>>>> before allocating dest temporary register >>>>> >>>>> Or it will cause issue by the dest temporary registers. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang<gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> target-tilegx/translate.c | 85 >>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- >>>>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> Isn't my patch 14/14 from the last patch set sufficient? >>>> >> >> At present, all patches (include 14/14) are integrated into master tree, >> so I guess, we have to integrate this patch into master tree next, it >> fix the dest temporary registers' issue. > > What issue? The prefetch instructions "load" to the zero register, > which is never written back to the register file. >
OK, really. But for me, the code is very easy to lead other members to make mistakes. Thanks. -- Chen Gang (陈刚) Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
