On 10/13/2015 04:53 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 24 September 2015 at 20:43, Christopher Covington <c...@codeaurora.org> > wrote: >> cpu_get_ticks() provides a common interface across targets for >> calculating CPU cycles. Using this fixes PMCCNTR reads when -icount >> is specified (previously a non-increasing value was returned). >> >> Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <c...@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> target-arm/helper.c | 9 +++------ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > So, I think the conclusion from this thread was that we should > (a) change the default cpu_get_host_ticks() implementation to > call get_clock() > (b) rebase this patch and apply it > > Is anybody planning to do that?
It's not in my plans at the moment. Thanks, Christopher Covington -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
