Hi Jason, thanks again for reviewing, On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 10/18/2015 03:53 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote: >> This series fixes several issues with incorrect packet/octet counting in >> e1000's Statistic registers, fixes a bug in the packet address filtering >> procedure, and implements many MAC registers that were absent before. >> Additionally, some cosmetic changes are made. >> >> Leonid Bloch (6): >> e1000: Cosmetic and alignment fixes >> e1000: Trivial implementation of various MAC registers >> e1000: Fixing the received/transmitted packets' counters >> e1000: Fixing the received/transmitted octets' counters >> e1000: Fixing the packet address filtering procedure >> e1000: Implementing various counters >> >> hw/net/e1000.c | 313 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- >> hw/net/e1000_regs.h | 8 +- >> 2 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) >> > > Looks good to me overall, just few comments in individual patches. > > A question here, is there any real user/OSes that tries to use those > registers? If not, maintain them sees a burden and it's a little bit > hard the test them unless unit-test were implemented for those > registers. And I'd like to know the test status of this series. At least > both windows and linux guest need to be tested. > > Thanks
While we did not encounter any actual drivers that malfunction because of
the lack of these registers, implementing them makes the device closer to
Intel's specs, and reduces the chances that some OSes, currently or in the
future, may misbehave because of the missing registers. The implementation
of these additional registers seems as a natural continuation of this
series, the main purpose of which is to fix several bugs in this device.
As for testing, it was performed, obviously, in several different scenarios
with Linux (Fedora 22) + Windows (2012R2) guests. No regressions (and no
statistically significant deviations) were found. Please find
representative results (TCP, 1 stream) for both Linux and Windows guests
below:
Fedora 22 guest -- receive
5 +-+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| A
4.5 +-+ A A A B
4 +-+ A A |
| A B |
3.5 +-+ |
| A |
G 3 +-+ B |
b 2.5 +-+ |
/ | |
s 2 +-+ |
| A |
1.5 +-+ |
| |
1 +-+ A |
0.5 +-+ A |
A + + + + + + + + + + +
0 +-+---+------+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+
32B 64B 128B 256B 512B 1KB 2KB 4KB 8KB 16KB 32KB
64KB
+--------Buffer size--------+
Mean-old -- A Mean-new -- B
Fedora 22 guest -- transmit
2 +-+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| B A
1.8 +-+ A |
1.6 +-+ |
| |
1.4 +-+ A |
| |
G 1.2 +-+ |
b 1 +-+ |
/ | A |
s 0.8 +-+ |
| |
0.6 +-+ A |
| |
0.4 +-+ A |
0.2 +-+ A |
+ + + + A + + + + + + +
0 A-+---A------A-----A-----+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+
32B 64B 128B 256B 512B 1KB 2KB 4KB 8KB 16KB 32KB
64KB
+--------Buffer size--------+
Mean-old -- A Mean-new -- B
Windows 2012R2 guest -- receive
3.5 +-+------------------------------------------------------------------A
| A A B
3 +-+ |
| A |
| |
2.5 +-+ |
| A |
G 2 +-+ |
b | |
/ | A |
s 1.5 +-+ |
| B |
1 +-+ A |
| |
| A |
0.5 +-+ A |
+ A A + + + + + + + + +
0 A-+---+------+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+
32B 64B 128B 256B 512B 1KB 2KB 4KB 8KB 16KB 32KB
64KB
+--------Buffer size--------+
Mean-old -- A Mean-new -- B
Windows 2012R2 guest --transmit
2.5 +-+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| A A
| B |
2 +-+ A |
| |
| A |
| |
G 1.5 +-+ B |
b | A |
/ | |
s 1 +-+ |
| B |
| A A |
| A |
0.5 +-+ A A |
| A |
A + + + + + + + + + + +
0 +-+---+------+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+
32B 64B 128B 256B 512B 1KB 2KB 4KB 8KB 16KB 32KB
64KB
+--------Buffer size--------+
Mean-old -- A Mean-new -- B
Regards,
Leonid.
___
